← Search

Michael Isaza

TOOELE, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 142W–82L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Michael Isaza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history224 matches
L
2026-09-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitchell John
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · Torres-tial Smash · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hailey Mann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · Torres-tial Smash · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hailey Mann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
Spencer Grabow / Brenden van Berkum
2026-08-20 · Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Edward Ekstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · Sports Mall-Vos/Isaza · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colton Kasteler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Joseph Bush / Milad Sefiddashti
2026-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with John Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · Torres-tial Smash · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hailey Mann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Torres-tial Smash · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenna DeLong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jesse Mangum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
81.8%
36W–8L · 62.4% of games
3.5
62.2%
46W–28L · 53.5% of games
4.0
16.7%
3W–15L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 77.4% of games
6.5mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 63.2% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal