← Search

Natalie Romaniw

Draper, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 45W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natalie Romaniw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
Francie Peters / Elizabeth Harris-Johnson
2026-09-12 · SM-Harris & the Serve-Ivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-28 · Liberty Park-Wright · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Daniel Ramirez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicholas Geer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-31 · Liberty Park-Wright · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Logan Cole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-17 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Colby Pomeroy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
Michelle Meert / Carter Kessler
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Logan Cole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Naga Bhargav Paritala championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Cindy Woods / Brady Mcginley
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Logan Cole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Kirk Porritt / Monica Hubbard
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Naga Bhargav Paritala championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Max Harnicher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Naga Bhargav Paritala championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-03 · SM-Harris & the Serve-Ivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.7% of games
3.5
61.3%
19W–12L · 56.2% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 80.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert