← Search

Lexi Farr

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 161W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lexi Farr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Sports Mall-Green/Farr · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Masha Mulcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-01 · Sports Mall-Green/Farr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bethany Bodily
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-28 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Farr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Farr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Out of Your League · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Farr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · Out of Your League · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mae Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Out of Your League · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tori Locke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Kelly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Teisa Linscott / Katie Zimmerman
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Karishma Shah championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Tori Locke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Mae Alexander championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.6% of games
2.5
70%
14W–6L · 56.2% of games
3.0
52.4%
22W–20L · 52.6% of games
3.5
72.8%
75W–28L · 57.9% of games
4.0
75%
15W–5L · 55.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49.4% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 44.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
32 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe