← Search

Karthik Kasiviswanathan

South Jordan, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 79W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karthik Kasiviswanathan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Lutz · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Lovestrand mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · Lutz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Bayna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Lovestrand mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · Sports Mall Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Finlay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Lovestrand mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Sports Mall Blue · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milad Sefiddashti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · Sports Mall Blue · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Milad Sefiddashti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Yoko Walljasper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Lexi Farr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Betty Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.9%
54W–28L · 54.7% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games
6.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 57.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer