← Search

Rob Faux

Provo, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 67W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rob Faux to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-01 · SunPro-Faux/Olson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · SunPro-Faux/Olson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhett Housley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Call
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with David McGill championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
John Nelson / David Ludlow
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Hugh Olmstead championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · SunPro-Faux/Olson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-13 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Mimides
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Matthew Heller / William Bryant
2026-06-09 · #3 Doubles · with Kaden Henry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Gwilliam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-26 · SunPro-Faux/Olson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · SunPro-Faux/Olson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
70.3%
45W–19L · 56.6% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.1% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.6% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer