← Search

Steve Call

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Orem, UT
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 20W–14L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history34 matches
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Faux championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcus Minton championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Burningham championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcus Minton
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Burningham
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David McGill
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcus Minton
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Faux
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-06-18 · SunPro-Faux/McGill · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Woods
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-11 · SunPro-Faux/McGill · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Faux
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-04 · SunPro-Faux/McGill · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirk Hall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David McGill championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 54% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 59.1% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal