← Search

Mary Vander Straten

Syracuse, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 95W–175L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Vander Straten to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
Matthew Lee / Laura Needham
2026-08-07 · Liberty Park-Wright · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fletcher Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · Liberty Park-Wright · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Max Harnicher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Liberty Park-Wright · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Bliss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Tana Coleman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tana Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Cheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-20 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-12 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tana Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 59.5% of games
3.5
35.3%
67W–123L · 43.7% of games
4.0
17.9%
7W–32L · 31.2% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 37.1% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
40 matches
#2 Singles
7%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova