← Search

Katie Leikin

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 104W–125L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katie Leikin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-09-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · They Torres Up · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Milad Sefiddashti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · They Torres Up · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with McKay Renstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-08 · Full Metal Racquets · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nicholas Mihalyi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Tri and Stop Us · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celest Andrade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · They Torres Up · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fernando Torres mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Tri and Stop Us · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lexie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-26 · They Torres Up · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Milad Sefiddashti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · Eccles- CJS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Annen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marianne Squires
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.8% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
49%
51W–53L · 49.8% of games
4.0
50%
19W–19L · 49% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 35.3% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.5% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 42.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.2% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
53 matches
#1 Singles
11%
25 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams