Teams

Liberty Park-Causing a Racquet

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W PM

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-06Won 21
W#1 DoublesShannon Knudsen / Jennifer Tooley vs Lisa Beames / Rachel Mills7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBessy Nielson / JaNean Nelson vs Jeanette Shepard / Claudine Finlay7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Galbreath / Kelley Allred vs Kristel Affleck / Yoko Walljasper6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-29Split 11
L#1 DoublesJaNean Nelson / Bessy Nielson vs Davinia Lyon / Kyra Dunshee6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHannah Galbreath / Linda Lasater vs Kelly Singer / Maria Pettit5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-15vs Cottonwood Club-HaverkostWon 21
L#1 DoublesShannon Knudsen / Jennifer Tooley vs Lori Carter / Rebecca England6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBessy Nielson / JaNean Nelson vs Taylor Haverkost / Jacqueline Heitner6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHannah Galbreath / Kelley Allred vs Mikelle Moore / Alison Pearce6-0, 6-3
2026-07-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Sorensen / JaNean Nelson vs Kelly Krueger / Hillary Jeppsen2-6, 4-6
2026-07-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesJaNean Nelson / Mary Sorensen vs Shana Wood / Courtney Archibald6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-27vs Forty LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaryam Klock / Jennie Stacey vs Toinette Walker / Bernadette Muniz2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBessy Nielson / JaNean Nelson vs Angelyn Sorenson / Lori Prince Hagood6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShannon Knudsen / Laura Espinosa vs Kyoko Jensen / Sharilee Hill4-6, 4-6
2026-06-17vs SunPro Summer TweenersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Shannon Knudsen vs Pamela Raleigh / Sherston Faux6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennie Stacey vs Kim Ward6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Bessy Nielson
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Ewing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.25
Hannah Lee
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Shannon Knudsen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Maryam Klock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Lasater
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Cortney Nebeker
published 3
3.04
Jennifer Kawakami
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
JaNean Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Laura Espinosa
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.88
Mary Sorensen
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
2.85
Kelley Allred
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.80
Hannah Galbreath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kawakami + Hannah Lee6162% games+11.2% vs expected
Mary Sorensen + Linda Lasater8165% games+7.7% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Hannah Lee5258% games+4.9% vs expected
Mary Sorensen + Jennifer Kawakami11655% games+3.5% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Jennifer Wecker8163% games+1.7% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Shannon Knudsen171450% games+0.8% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Maryam Klock3447% games+0.3% vs expected
Laura Espinosa + Linda Lasater3353% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Lisa Ewing
123W–122L career · 12 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Hannah Lee
101W–74L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 14 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Shannon Knudsen
22W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · 9 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Maryam Klock
77W–91L career · 10 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Linda Lasater
60W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Cortney Nebeker
45W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Jennifer Kawakami
52W–47L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3.5
JaNean Nelson
116W–137L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Laura Espinosa
21W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Mary Sorensen
42W–45L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Kelley Allred
71W–58L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Hannah Galbreath
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.