← Search

Felicia Galati

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
219 matches · 108W–111L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Felicia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Felicia is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Felicia has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Felicia has gone from the 19th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
55%
82W–67L · 53.2% of games
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 34.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 54.3% of games
7.0
25%
4W–12L · 37.2% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history219 matches
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Brown
+0.043better than expected — took 58% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Patricia Booth / Janis Elliott
2025-12-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Bender
+0.048better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-12-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristyl Addison
−0.041below expectation — took 63% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kelly Schwalbe / Sara Schnabel
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Bender
+0.020better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Adrian Cutolo / Sarah Jane Howell
2025-10-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Fleury
+0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Gaughan
−0.033below expectation — took 42% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Sue Rodrigues / Tenli Flourens
2025-10-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
+0.010better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Laura Rawlins / Toni Garza
2025-09-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
+0.043better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Elizabeth Pierce / Pascale Diaine
2025-09-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Fleury
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-09-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary McCrary
−0.028below expectation — took 0% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Alisa Kesler / Lori Prince Hagoodchamps
2025-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Morrison
−0.117below expectation — took 0% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Maureen Caruso / Liz MacDonaldchamps
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Jill Morrison
−0.011about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.