← Search

Brenda Talley

Mount Charleston, NV
3.0A year-end 2025
165 matches · 31W–134L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Brenda sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Brenda is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brenda has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Brenda has gone from the 11th to the 0th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 32.5% of games
3.5
12.8%
10W–68L · 31.3% of games
6.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 47% of games
7.0
25.5%
13W–38L · 36.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history165 matches
L
Melissa Ruediger / Charlotte Durisseau
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Booth
+0.004below expectation — took 14% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vikki Doak
+0.011about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janis Elliott
+0.020about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Guadalupe Sherman
−0.028below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Mary Ann Apone / Abigail Cox
2025-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
−0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Holly Crosby / Jenny Mulopulos
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Emmy Perez
2025-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Lisa Aldulaimi / Christie Sanders
2025-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Premone
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-04-05 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Chelsi Grady / Crystal Ziebarth
2025-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debra Kelleher
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-03-22 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.014below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-03-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
−0.004below expectation — took 0% of games against 19% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.