Search

Debra Kelleher

Las Vegas, NV
3.0A year-end 2025
228 matches · 85W–143L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.63. Higher than today’s 2.62 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
131 of 134
NV · 3.0
163 of 166

Debra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Debra has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Debra has gone from the 5th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
48.4%
45W–48L · 48% of games
3.0
29.9%
35W–82L · 41.2% of games
5.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 29.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history228 matches
L
Venetia Espinueva / Tiffany Vance
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Fleury
0.065below expectation — took 8% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali Wolak
0.014below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mortensen
0.017below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Pierce / Carine Tsveniashvili
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Gordon
+0.015better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
Monica Taylor / Sue Rodrigues
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali Wolak
+0.020better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Julie Hughes / Celeste Hughes
2026-02-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Rodrigues
0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roni Tarr
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Tori Walker / Amy Christiansen
2026-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
0.016below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Carrie Maddux / Therese Laudenslager
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roni Tarr
0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Elizabeth Pierce / Carine Tsveniashvili
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali Wolak
+0.034better than expected — took 54% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Abigail Cox / Francie Angelov
2025-12-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Britten
0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-12-10 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
0.043below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.