Search

Gina Alcoser

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2024
98 matches · 56W–42L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
110 of 134
NV · 3.0
137 of 166

Gina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gina has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Gina has gone from the 9th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
60.8%
31W–20L · 54.1% of games
3.0
53.7%
22W–19L · 53.5% of games
5.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yong Mi DeMilliano
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristyl Addison
+0.013better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Meryll Ledesma / Mich LeRoy
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Birnbaum
0.025below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jena Domingue / Sydney Collins
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabel Elliott
0.040below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Venetia Espinueva / Amy Bernstein
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabel Elliott
+0.021better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Katie Sanders / Jenni Pevoto
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annabel Elliott
+0.056better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather DeMasi
+0.024better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Aida Shirley / Nina Rossi
2024-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandria Chang
+0.041better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Mary Beth Zamani / Yesenia Arias
2024-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Hawkinson
+0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Robi Hinton / Melissa Arcella
2024-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Hom
+0.034better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Maureen Caruso / Lynn Row
2024-10-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsie Hawkinson
+0.042better than expected — took 72% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
2024-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Birnbaum
0.015below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.