← Search

Joan Schneikart

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 8W–17L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history25 matches
L
2026-08-06 · DOUBLES TROUBLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcia Halperin
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-31 · Bellevue 55 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Henderson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · DOUBLES TROUBLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Popel
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · DOUBLES TROUBLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Boudart
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Popel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hope Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dee Burnett
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-2
W
Jessica Hamill / Jane Kursh
2024-07-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dee Burnett
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2024-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dee Burnett
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Parcells
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Beach
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-0
L
2023-07-31 · Aceing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Berk
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 26.1% of games
7.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova