← Search

Wendy Stam

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Middletown, DE
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 1W–10L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history11 matches
L
2026-07-31 · Doubles Rock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Hassiepen
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Doubles Rock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Couch
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · Doubles Rock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Meier
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Doubles Rock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arleen Mitchell
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · Doubles Rock · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arleen Mitchell
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-13 · Doubles Rock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joy Feng
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Couch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Fitch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Kondrad
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Dehaven
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Gallard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 28.2% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 82% of the time
#3 Doubles
82%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
1 match
#2 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe