← Search

Janice Dugan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Malvern, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 23W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history65 matches
W
2026-05-28 · Vicmead · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Stewart
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · Vicmead · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kecia Burpulis
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-30 · SETs APPEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Henderson
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smyth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
Jessica Hoopes / Penny Link
2025-08-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Beuchler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smyth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smyth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Giacco
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-12-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Giacco
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-11-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marion DuPont
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2023-11-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Giacco
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Wildrick
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
35.7%
15W–27L · 46.4% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
40%
8W–12L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer