← Search

Rachel Fritz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MILFORD, DE
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 95W–69L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history164 matches
L
2024-06-24 · Team 4 Edmondson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Marshall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-10 · Team 4 Edmondson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marion Dearth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-4
L
2024-06-03 · Team 4 Edmondson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alice Edmondson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-5
W
2024-05-20 · Team 4 Edmondson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peg Blomme
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Courtenay Culp championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-09-29 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Courtenay Culp championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-08-23 · Team 1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Neils
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-4
L
2023-08-21 · Team 1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lu Ann Rubenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
W
2023-08-19 · Team 1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lu Ann Rubenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-08-15 · Team 1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Neils
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-5
L
2023-08-13 · Team 1 Net Stalkers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Heyde
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-11 · Team 1 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan S Oelschlager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2024
Team 4 Edmondson
2024 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2024
Shelor
2023 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel 65 & Over 8.0 Women · 65+
2023
Team 1
2023 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2023
Team 1
2023 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women · NOVA Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women · 65+
2023
Team 1 Net Stalkers
2023 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Indoor · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2023
Shelor
2022 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women · 65+
2022
Team 1 Net Stalkers
2022 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2022
Team 1 Net Stalkers
2022 NOVA Adult 55 & Over · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2022
Team 12 Net Stalkers
2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2022
Team Baird
2022 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women · NOVA Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women · 65+
2022
Langbord
2021 VA Beach Adult 55 & Over Tennis Patrons · VA Beach Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0 · 55+
2021
Marques
2021 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over Spring · Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0 · 55+
2021
On the Line
2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 · 18+
2021
Shelor
2021 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Adult 65 & Over Women 8.0 · 65+
2021
Team 16 Set to Win
2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0 · 40+
2021
Team 3 Net Assets
2021 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women 8.0 · 55+
2021
Team 5 Net Assets
2021 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Indoor · NOVA 55 & Over Women 8.0 · 55+
2021
Team Baird
2021 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women · 2021 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women 8.0 · 65+
2021
Sommers
2020 Winter Montgomery County Adult 40 & Over League · 4.0 40 & Over Women · 40+
2020
Team 3 Smack That Ace
2020 NOVA Adult 40 & Over League, Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2020
Baird
2019 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women's League · 2019 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women's 8.0 League · 65+
2019
Carson
2019 Spring Montgomery County Adult 55 & Over League · 8.0 55 & Over Women · 55+
2019
Langbord
2019 VA Beach Adult 55 & Over Tennis Patrons League · VA Beach Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2019
Marques
2019 Montgomery County Tri-Level Fall League · Women's Mid Tri-Level 3.5-4.0-4.5
2019
Mid-Atlantic/Hume/65&Over9.0W
2019 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women's League · 2019 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women's 9.0 League · 65+
2019
Mid-Atlantic/Shelor/65&Over8.0W
2019 Anne Arundel County Adult 65 & Over League · 8.0 65 & Over Women · 65+
2019
Smack That Ace
2019 NOVA Adult 18 & Over League · NOVA Adult 18&Over 4.0 Women · 18+
2019
Team 2 Smack That Ace
2019 NOVA Adult 40 & Over League, Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2019
Team 3 A Smack That Ace
2019 NOVA Adult 40 & Over League, Winter Indoor · NOVA Indoor Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2019
Team 4
2019 NOVA Adult 55 & Over League, Women's Evening · 8.0 NOVA Women's Evening · 55+
2019
Team 4
2019 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Women's Day League · 8.0 Women · 55+
2019
Team 5 Tri's the Limit
2019 NOVA Tri-Level Winter Women's League · NOVA 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 Tri-Level, Women
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.1%
28W–21L · 53.5% of games
8.0
58.2%
64W–46L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova