← Search

Michael van Dusen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jupiter, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 15W–6L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history21 matches
W
2026-04-26 · IRMSL/Whidden · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Whidden championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · IRMSL/Whidden · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Whidden championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-25 · IRMSL/Whidden · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Whidden championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-11-01 · IRMSL/Whidden · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Triggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-10-11 · IRMSL/Whidden · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Triggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-02-22 · IRMSL/Whidden/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Triggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-11-02 · Winner/Whidden · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Triggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-10-12 · Winner/Whidden · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Triggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-10-05 · Winner/Whidden · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Triggs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-02-17 · IRMSL/Whidden/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Westmoreland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-02-10 · IRMSL/Whidden/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Whidden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-02-03 · IRMSL/Whidden/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shane Daniel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 72.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
10 matches
Singles
24%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe