← Search

Paul Zack

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
309 matches · 159W–150L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history309 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Thomas
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-25 · HCC/Schneider · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Lee
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-10-18 · HCC/Schneider · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Conston
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-10-13 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Center mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-2
W
2026-10-10 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Thomas
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-04 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caralyn Paul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Kandell
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caralyn Paul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-26 · HCC/Schneider · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Max Collazo
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Thomas
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-20 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Center mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · Arbor Greene Bourbon Boys/Williams · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Arfsten
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69.8%
30W–13L · 58.2% of games
4.5
33.7%
31W–61L · 45.5% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 64% of games
8.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 46.8% of games
8.5
38.5%
15W–24L · 45.2% of games
9.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
65.6%
63W–33L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
126 matches
#1 Doubles
41%
125 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams