← Search

Caralyn Paul

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gibsonton, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
473 matches · 294W–179L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history473 matches
L
2026-11-02 · Arbor Greene 4.0ESL LOVAS/Paul · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mulrooney
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-11-01 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Layton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-26 · Arbor Greene 4.0ESL LOVAS/Paul · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Voelker
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with MARY HESTON
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-25 · Heritage Island/Leppert · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jacqueline Bryan
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-19 · Arbor Greene 4.0ESL LOVAS/Paul · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-18 · Arbor Greene 7.5 50+ LOVAS/Paul · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Geri Burke
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-12 · Arbor Greene 4.0ESL LOVAS/Paul · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Indumathi Krishnamurthy
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-11 · Arbor Greene 7.5 50+ LOVAS/Paul · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joan Whitten
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-09 · HCC/Price · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irene Nasworthy
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Arbor Greene 4.0ESL LOVAS/Paul · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Hanson
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · Arbor Greene 8.0x 55+/Paul · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Zack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.2%
116W–47L · 57.9% of games
4.0
46%
57W–67L · 47.7% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
68%
17W–8L · 57.1% of games
7.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 60.7% of games
7.5
66%
35W–18L · 57.1% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 46% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
20W–15L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
75.8%
25W–8L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
167 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
133 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
128 matches
#1 Singles
5%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer