← Search

Nicole Giusto

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lakeland, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 142W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history211 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Mareuvir Ilanga
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · Plant City The Real Showgirls/Spears · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krissy Heybroek
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-20 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Gretchen Wood
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-09 · Plant City The Real Showgirls/Spears · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deb Spears
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-06 · Beerman Smart Aces/Giusto · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Amanda Strawbridge
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · Plant City Tennis/TheRealShowGirlzofPC/ D. spears · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krissy Heybroek
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · POLK/Buffington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Schick
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · POLK/Buffington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniela Schick
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · POLK/Giusto · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ruthie Tait
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · Plant City Tennis/TheRealShowGirlzofPC/ D. spears · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Rogers
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · POLK/Buffington · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lizbeth Engle
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-10 · Plant City Tennis/TheRealShowGirlzofPC/ D. spears · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Gardner
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
84.6%
33W–6L · 66.6% of games
3.0
90%
18W–2L · 66.8% of games
3.5
86.5%
32W–5L · 66.4% of games
4.0
44%
33W–42L · 46.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 58.6% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#2 Female Doubles
8%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
12 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova