← Search

Jonathan Bowdler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 149W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history231 matches
W
2026-10-12 · HHTL (A) 4.0 Men 65 & Over (Tupper) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendell Anderson championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-12 · HHTL (A) 4.0 Men 65 & Over (Tupper) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendell Anderson championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-11 · HHTL (A) 4.0 Men 65 & Over (Tupper) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendell Anderson championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Shaw championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Shaw championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Lammers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Shaw championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rakesh Latchamsetty championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-31 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Taylor championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rakesh Latchamsetty championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chih Lin championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-01 · CHIP-Howard 55s 8.0M F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Schalk
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.8%
86W–39L · 56.3% of games
4.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.8% of games
8.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 52.4% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert