← Search

Mike Hyde

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oklahoma City, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 13W–20L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history33 matches
L
2025-07-12 · OK/Billingsley/55&over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Almaraz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-30 · OK/Billingsley/55&over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Box
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-23 · OK/Billingsley/55&over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marcelo Puiggari
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-06-17 · OK/Billingsley/55&over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marcelo Puiggari
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-18 · OKC/Davis-Kutch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Brett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-04 · OKC/Davis-Kutch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Ogle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-04-25 · OKC/Davis-Kutch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Derek Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-04-13 · OKC/Davis-Kutch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Derek Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-04-06 · OKC/Davis-Kutch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barney Moon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
W
2023-07-08 · Chalkers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marcelo Puiggari
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-21 · Chalkers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marcelo Puiggari
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-06-19 · Chalkers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marcelo Puiggari
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 64.5% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.5% of games
9.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
10 matches
Singles
24%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe