← Search

Shaji Jacob

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Edmond, OK
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 41W–48L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history89 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rip Royse
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-24 · Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Collings
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-12 · Stokes · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Peters
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-30 · Stokes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ben Mccarley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-23 · Stokes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rip Royse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-22 · Mismatch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Ridens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-17 · Stokes · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rip Royse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-11 · Stokes · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rip Royse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-26 · Tran/Stokes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with An Nguyen
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-06-05 · Tran/Stokes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Peters
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2024-05-09 · Tran/Stokes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Choi
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-05-05 · OK/Lane/55&over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Peters
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.6% of games
4.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 47% of games
8.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.6% of games
9.0
19%
4W–17L · 34.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe