← Search

James Holmes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pensacola, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 51W–35L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Prindiville - PCC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy McIntosh Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-07 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Fabbro
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-30 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mario Stramaglia
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-24 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Sitton
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-09-19 · Prindiville - PCC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy McIntosh Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-12 · Prindiville - PCC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy McIntosh Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Sitton
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-02 · Fabbro - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Spencer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-31 · Richardson - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Whitney Sumrall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Sitton championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Hagar championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Sitton championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 9.1% of games
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 52.8% of games
6.5
80%
12W–3L · 59.2% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 47% of games
2.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.2% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
Singles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe