← Search

Andersson Perilla

Hollywood, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 145W–113L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Andersson Perilla to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Piccolo/Perilla · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with GONZALO GARCIA
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-08 · Piccolo/Perilla · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANDRES LOZANO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-02 · Piccolo/Perilla · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carlos Aldrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Piccolo/Perilla · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANDRES LOZANO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-27 · Piccolo/Perilla · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alfonso Galindo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-17 · Piccolo/Perilla · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julian Castano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Humberto Valbuena championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Kattan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Julian Castano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Piccolo/Perilla · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Miguel Florez Parra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · Piccolo/Perilla · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roberto Gentile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · Piccolo/Perilla · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alfonso Galindo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 65.4% of games
3.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 58% of games
4.0
57.1%
52W–39L · 54.3% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.1% of games
6.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 55.6% of games
7.5
76%
19W–6L · 55.6% of games
8.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 41.2% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.2% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.8% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
65 matches
#1 Singles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
7%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova