← Search

Ignacio Avila

Doral, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 130W–42L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Ignacio Avila to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Molinari (Crandon Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilmer Canaviri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Molinari (Crandon Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Daniel Oropeza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · Sengupta (Crandon Park) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ariel Fachini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Anthony Bonvino championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Ivan Holmquist championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Olivier Walon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · Doral Park TRI 4.5 Team · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Holmquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Molinari (Crandon Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andres E. Lozano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Doral Park TRI 4.5 Team · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Holmquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Molinari (Crandon Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jose Larrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Sengupta (Crandon Park) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Federico Molinari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Doral Park TRI 4.5 Team · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nestor Rincon Soto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
11W–0L · 71.3% of games
4.0
75.9%
41W–13L · 59.3% of games
4.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 36.8% of games
7.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 65.6% of games
8.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 62% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
49 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams