← Search

Rohan Ramdeholl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Melbourne, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 138W–52L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history190 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Fee - Moore · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Noah Rawls
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-14 · EFSC - White · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elliott Hulscher
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-01 · Fee - Moore · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Peterson
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-30 · Viera Regional Park - Ramdeholl · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Dini
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-24 · Fee - Moore · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kenneth Moore
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-23 · Viera Regional Park - Ramdeholl · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Dini
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-10 · Fee - Moore · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Peterson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-03 · Fee - Moore · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Pokol
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · Viera Regional Park - Ramdeholl · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Dini
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-0
L
2026-08-20 · Fee - Moore · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Peterson
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Hartnett championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Hartnett championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 64.8% of games
3.5
93%
40W–3L · 67.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 55.8% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 30.5% of games
6.5
100%
10W–0L · 79.5% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 76.9% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.6% of games
6.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
70.6%
24W–10L · 60.7% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova