← Search

Cindy Newman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 99W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history170 matches
W
2026-10-23 · LCTA54/Newman-Miller/Park West · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Crookes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-09 · LCTA54/Newman-Miller/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Dangerfield
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-23 · LCTA64/Portman/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bari Kahn
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-02 · LCTA55/Newman-Miller/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenifer Lake
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-26 · LCTA40/Rokette/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Miller
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-20 · LCTA55/Newman-Miller/Park West · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Miller
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-19 · LCTA40/Rokette/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Miller
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · LCTA55/Newman-Miller/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Dangerfield
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-12 · LCTA40/Rokette/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karin Crookes
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-29 · LCTA40/Rokette/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Miller
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-14 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mindy Spring
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
64.3%
74W–41L · 56% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.9% of games
5.5
60%
12W–8L · 54.6% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 50.3% of games
3.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.5% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert