← Search

Jenifer Lake

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mt Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 76W–160L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history236 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Net Results · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynden Pelbath
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-30 · LCTA54/Newman-Miller/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte Stein
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-25 · Net Results · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane DeVall
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-23 · LCTA54/Newman-Miller/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Dangerfield
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-10-18 · Net Results · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Breen
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-15 · LCTA54/Biggs/DunesWest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Breidenbruch
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-15 · Net Results · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Shellnutt
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-09 · LCTA54/Newman-Miller/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anjanette Curry
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · LCTA55/Frankel/DunesWest · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Connie Biggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · LCTA40/Meszaros/DunesWest · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Meszaros
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · LCTA55/Frankel/DunesWest · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Baraso
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · LCTA40/Meszaros/DunesWest · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Thorne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.7% of games
3.5
34.1%
43W–83L · 44.5% of games
6.5
27.3%
12W–32L · 41.1% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.2% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
18.2%
4W–18L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe