← Search

Terry Christophel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vacaville, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 24W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history71 matches
L
2026-04-07 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Kim
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-16 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Hill
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-09 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Imelda Lee
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-10 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 40AW3.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Duncan
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-06 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 65AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yolanda Irigon
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-03 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 40AW3.5A-DT · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-30 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL 40AW3.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Parvin
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-11 · GREEN VALLEY CC S70W6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yolanda Irigon
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-12-10 · GREEN VALLEY CC S70W6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yolanda Irigon
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-12-09 · GREEN VALLEY CC S70W6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yolanda Irigon
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-21 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW6.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Lister
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-10-09 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW6.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Lister
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 44.7% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 31.1% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.1% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games
6.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 40.4% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams