← Search

Margaret Angelovich

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 105W–82L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history187 matches
L
2026-07-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Hoffman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-12 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Lombardi championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Hoffman championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Hoffman
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-03 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with ALLISON WHITLOCK
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edlira Muratas
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · SILVERADO CC 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deniece Mailloux championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-19 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Magaly Otero
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christy Roberts
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-07 · NAPA VALLEY TC/SILVERADO CC 65AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Hoffman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-06 · SILVERADO CC 65AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kramer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-30 · SILVERADO CC 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Colvin
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.6% of games
3.0
62.9%
22W–13L · 54% of games
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.3% of games
5.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.7% of games
6.0
66.2%
49W–25L · 58.8% of games
6.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.1% of games
7.0
65%
13W–7L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer