← Search

David Carberry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, MN
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 18W–14L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history32 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Weed: Don Ho and the Honeybadgers · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Biernat
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · Weed: Don Ho and the Honeybadgers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Biernat
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-04 · Dalton Sons of Methuselah -Summer 2025 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Jerdee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-11 · Northern/Lambert/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karl Lambert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-05-23 · Northern/Lambert/55&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Biernat
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
W
2024-05-16 · Northern/Lambert/55&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Marolt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
L
2022-07-14 · Radermacher S · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charles Carroll
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-05-12 · Radermacher S · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Toal
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2022-03-15 · Gullikson- grizzled vets · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Kron
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-03-14 · Gullikson- grizzled vets · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Kron
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-02-28 · Gullikson- grizzled vets · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marc Stingley
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-01-31 · Gullikson- grizzled vets · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bradley Olson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.4% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams