← Search

Janet Brunecz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Canton, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 19W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history47 matches
L
2026-07-21 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Grisez
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Grisez
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue van Etten
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue van Etten
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-25 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Golkiewicz
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-02 · A55 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Labut
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-27 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue van Etten
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-11 · A55 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanna Racine
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-06 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Jefferies
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-05-23 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Allen
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-07-17 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Simon
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-07-13 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Allen
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.4% of games
6.0
43.9%
18W–23L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer