← Search

Patricia Golkiewicz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Akron, OH
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 20W–30L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history50 matches
L
2025-07-09 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Grisez
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-18 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hultz
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-28 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue van Etten
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-25 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Brunecz
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-02 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-18 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hultz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-28 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-23 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janice Hall Moore
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-05-14 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Firtha
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-17 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Labut
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-23 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janice Hall Moore
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-06-08 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Simon
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
65%
13W–7L · 57.6% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 30.4% of games
5.5
25%
2W–6L · 43.2% of games
6.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams