← Search

Linda Goad

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 16W–22L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
L
2026-04-18 · Indy 7.5W SAT CRC Trott · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lorrie Pavlack
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-08 · CIN A40 4.0W TU CRC Brueggemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gigi Griffin
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-12-03 · CIN A40 4.0W TU CRC Brueggemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Gold
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-19 · CIN A40 4.0W TU CRC Brueggemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristina Szabo
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-0
L
2024-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Morley
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Somer Compton
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-10-22 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 W, Brueggemann (CRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joan Eicher
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-1
L
2023-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joan Eicher
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2022-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Huber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2022-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melinda Brueggemann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Fennerty
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 52.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.4% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer