← Search

Julie Elliott

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 82W–92L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history174 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Hittle · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Combs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-10-23 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Schneider championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-27 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Hittle · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Barnes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marsha Norris
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Schneider
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Schneider
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Ostrowski
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nanelle Rosales
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-3
W
2026-06-26 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Schneider
loading the estimate
8-4
W
2026-06-26 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Schneider
loading the estimate
8-2
W
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nanelle Rosales
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Default
2026-06-11 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Keaton · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mindy Blaiklock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.8% of games
4.0
59.2%
42W–29L · 57.4% of games
4.5
21.4%
6W–22L · 38.9% of games
7.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.5% of games
8.0
61%
25W–16L · 54.8% of games
8.5
0%
0W–9L · 25.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova