← Search

Lisa Schneider

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 84W–61L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history145 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Harker championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-24 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Harker championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-23 · Indy A65 8.0W IRCD Harker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Elliott championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Curtiss
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-5
W
2026-08-17 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Grissom
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Grissom
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with DEBORAH HAMEL
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ruth Grissom
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-5
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Kane
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Grissom
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Elliott
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Elliott
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79.5%
31W–8L · 62.3% of games
4.5
32%
16W–34L · 45.7% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.4% of games
8.0
76.2%
32W–10L · 59.3% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe