← Search

Katie Neal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Durham, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 68W–24L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history92 matches
L
2026-10-03 · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-10-02 · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-01 · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-21 · KMabe-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Loeb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · KMabe-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Huebner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · KMabe-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Feger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · KMabe-HR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Huebner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Donna Bauman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · GSmith-HR · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Moore
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · EWyngaarden-HR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Donna Bauman
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · GSmith-HR · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 71.1% of games
4.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 58.5% of games
7.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 60.9% of games
8.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
32 matches
#1 Singles
23%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#2 Singles
11%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova