← Search

Zoe Dubrow

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Durham, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
183 matches · 107W–76L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history183 matches
W
2026-10-15 · LHabib-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-05 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Justyne Ross
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · Ch.Higgins18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Wu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-27 · Ch.Higgins18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amelia Blankenship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-19 · ESpeicher-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Buyaki championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-19 · ESpeicher-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Tomkins championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-17 · ESpeicher-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Tomkins championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sindhu Shivaji
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sindhu Shivaji
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · Ch.Higgins18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Wu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Ch.Higgins18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Claire Songkakul
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-30 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 38.1% of games
4.5
68.5%
63W–29L · 55.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
8.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 59.1% of games
9.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 37.3% of games
4.5mixed
30%
6W–14L · 44.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.1% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Singles
18%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#2 Singles
8%
15 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova