← Search

Tanya Parise

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wake Forest, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
366 matches · 103W–263L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history366 matches
L
2026-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Smith championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
Paula Fernandez-Pita / Tanya Smith
2026-10-11 · El.Speicher18C · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Danielle Wilder
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-11 · El.Copeland40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
Tanya Smith / Michelle Spangenberg
2026-10-08 · TOC.Allara · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jette Efsen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
Laura Hiller / Tanya Smith
2026-10-05 · El.Copeland40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leigh Mullins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-04 · Ta.Parise18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Tanya Smith / Paula Fernandez-Pita
2026-10-04 · El.Speicher18C · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Paula Collado Cordon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
Tanya Smith / Mary Money
2026-09-28 · El.Copeland40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nora Lenahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
Tanya Smith / Trang Huynh
2026-09-17 · TOC.Allara · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nicole Rahm
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
Terry Dale / Tanya Smith
2026-09-14 · El.Copeland40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chunhui Higgins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · Ta.Parise18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Bricker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
Owen McGrew / Tanya Smith
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Kornstein mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
10%
1W–9L · 39.7% of games
4.5
32.5%
53W–110L · 45.2% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
26.5%
27W–75L · 44.9% of games
9.5
30%
6W–14L · 44.6% of games
10.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
32%
8W–17L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
15%
3W–17L · 41.2% of games
9.0mixed
18.2%
4W–18L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
156 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
90 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert