Search

Anna Tomkins

Durham, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
400 matches · 352W–48L · seasons 20212026

Captains: add Anna Tomkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history400 matches
L
2026-08-22 · MVL.Lazaro · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Heather Remley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Me.Delorme18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · MVL.Lazaro · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Heather Remley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · El.Speicher18C · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Madeline Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · He.Remley18M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · APerdue-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Hall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · He.Remley18T · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jennifer Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · He.Remley18M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · JRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neeta Vora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · He.Remley18T · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Karen Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · He.Remley18M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Skelly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · JRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bren Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 74.8% of games
3.5
94.6%
35W–2L · 73.7% of games
4.0
87.5%
49W–7L · 67.6% of games
4.5
81.5%
53W–12L · 63% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
20W–0L · 77% of games
7.5
90.5%
19W–2L · 74.1% of games
8.5
100%
20W–0L · 76.7% of games
9.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 65.1% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 70.1% of games
8.0mixed
84%
21W–4L · 66.7% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe