← Search

Anna Tomkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Durham, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
457 matches · 398W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history457 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Martin - Sake Tennis 18+ 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-08 · ACP.Fish · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Gardner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-05 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lina Habib
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-0
W
2026-09-28 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lina Habib
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-25 · ACP.Fish · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michele Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoe Dubrow championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kana Brinckerhoff championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoe Dubrow championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-09-14 · JRoss.8.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Leonard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-13 · Me.Delorme18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Griffin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-13 · El.Speicher18C · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Paula Fernandez-Pita
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · MVL.Lazaro · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Laura Alvarez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
2.5
100%
18W–0L · 73.6% of games
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 74.6% of games
3.5
94.6%
53W–3L · 74.4% of games
4.0
90.7%
78W–8L · 68.4% of games
4.5
75.8%
50W–16L · 60.7% of games
5.5
100%
11W–0L · 75.1% of games
6.5
88.9%
32W–4L · 69% of games
7.5
89.7%
26W–3L · 73.8% of games
8.5
88.2%
30W–4L · 72.2% of games
9.5
0%
0W–5L · 40% of games
4.5mixed
85%
17W–3L · 62% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
90.9%
20W–2L · 69.9% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
42W–7L · 65.2% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
174 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
88 matches
#1 Singles
14%
65 matches
#2 Singles
5%
22 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe