← Search

Leigh Barter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
276 matches · 207W–69L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history276 matches
L
2026-10-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Hobbs championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Crabtree championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meryl Golder championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-11 · Me.Golder18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Claire Hying
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-08 · Le.Barter18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Crabtree
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-10-04 · Me.Golder18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Claire Hying
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-28 · Le.Barter18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Namita Lokare
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-26 · Le.Barter18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Hobbs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-14 · ACP.Murdock · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meryl Golder
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-13 · Me.Golder18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hannah Boghosian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · Le.Barter18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Arcos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-23 · Me.Golder18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gabrielle Shields
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
100%
12W–0L · 67.8% of games
3.0
91.4%
32W–3L · 75.5% of games
3.5
85.5%
59W–10L · 64% of games
4.0
66.1%
41W–21L · 56.5% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
6.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 66.4% of games
7.5
50%
9W–9L · 51.8% of games
8.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.2% of games
2.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
4.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 48.1% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
64 matches
#1 Singles
17%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
44 matches
#2 Singles
9%
26 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams