← Search

Nancy Greer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Arlington, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 12W–36L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history48 matches
L
2025-10-17 · ATC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Alfino
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-26 · ATC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Alfino
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-05 · ATC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cass Weyandt
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-11 · Kiest/Brasko-Langlois W6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Thomas
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-03-21 · Kiest/Brasko-Langlois W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette McCracken
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-22 · Kiest/Langlois W6.0S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with LINDA FEATHERSTONE
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-08 · Kiest/Langlois W6.0S · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leah Ann Neal
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-01-25 · Kiest/Langlois W6.0S · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Thomas
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-19 · Hackberry Creek/Brasko W6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Brasko
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-3
W
2024-03-25 · Hackberry Creek/Brasko W6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-03-15 · Hackberry Creek/Brasko W6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Brasko
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-24 · Hackberry Creek/Brasko-Langlois W6.0S · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Thomas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 39.1% of games
6.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 40.7% of games
7.0
25%
4W–12L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer