← Search

Linda Hodge

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Garland, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 33W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history60 matches
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heidi Walsh championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-17 · Spring Park/Farley-Zartler W6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Stolakis
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-15 · Spring Park/Martinez W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Martinez
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · Spring Park/Martinez W6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heidi Walsh
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-03-31 · SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jan Freshwater
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-03-21 · SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alma Farley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-03-14 · SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chin Su
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-02-08 · SpringPark/Martinez W6.0S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Braswell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-01 · SpringPark/Martinez W6.0S · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Martinez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-12 · SpringPark/Martinez W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Kennedy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-04-05 · SpringPark/Martinez W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alma Farley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2023-03-24 · Springpark/Martinez W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alma Farley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
40%
6W–9L · 48.4% of games
6.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.8% of games
7.0
63.9%
23W–13L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert