← Search

Lisa Stolakis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richardson, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 33W–32L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history65 matches
W
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hodge
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Archbold
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Calhoun
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-21 · Spring Park/Martinez W6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Clemmons
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-10 · Canyon Creek/Ritz-Carlson W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-07 · Spring Park/Martinez W6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Clemmons
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Cook
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Cook
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Cook
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alma Farley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Euting
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Cook
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
16W–20L · 46.8% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 59.8% of games
7.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal