← Search

Phyllis Charles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
McKinney, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 37W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history65 matches
L
2026-04-24 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Conner
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-23 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Bice
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-16 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Coburn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-04-25 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Conner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-14 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Bickerstaff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-03-24 · Kiest/Altenau-Conner W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Altenau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-03-14 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Gann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-03 · Kiest/Altenau-Conner W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Thomas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-12 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Bice
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-03-22 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karla Jenkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-04-28 · Fretz/Blocker W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie James
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-04-21 · Fretz/Blocker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Becker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.1% of games
7.0
57.9%
33W–24L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova