← Search

Kathy Cook

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richardson, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 17W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history40 matches
L
2026-05-22 · High Point/Stolakis-Ferrell W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Euting
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · High Point/Stolakis-Ferrell W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Hartley
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-31 · High Point/Stolakis-Ferrell W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Ferrell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
Default
2026-03-20 · High Point/Stolakis-Ferrell W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Dunlap
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-16 · High Point/Ferrell W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stolakis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-25 · High Point/Ferrell W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stolakis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-07 · High Point/Ferrell W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stolakis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-21 · High Point/Ferrell W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitzi Bishop
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-02-08 · Canyon Creek/Hansen-Hart W7.0S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stolakis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-05-18 · Canyon Creek/Robbins-Langland W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Blythe
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-19 · High Point/Ferrell W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stolakis
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-12 · High Point/Ferrell W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stolakis
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 41.6% of games
7.0
55%
11W–9L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe