← Search

Janet Gigowski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
9 matches · 6W–3L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history9 matches
W
2026-05-22 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie James
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie James
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-15 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie James
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-13 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie James
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-27 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie James
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-20 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie James
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2019-02-14 · High Point/Olson W8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynne Sander
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2019-02-07 · High Point/Olson W8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melody Olson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2019-01-24 · High Point/Olson W8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melody Olson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.3% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe