← Search

Nancy Gibbs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MCKINNEY, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 19W–24L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-06-05 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sibyl Straughter
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-15 · Lifetime Plano/Carr W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Page Schreck
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · Lifetime Plano/Carr W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Page Schreck
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-24 · Lifetime Plano/Carr W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barb O'Rear
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · Lifetime Plano/Carr W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Tackaberry
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-23 · High Point/Walters W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Page Schreck
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-09 · High Point/Walters W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marla Howard
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-11 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leanna Cempre
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-5
L
2025-06-04 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisette Lichtenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-5
L
2025-05-21 · Olympic 2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Wiese
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-17 · High Point/Collins-Walters W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanna Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-03 · High Point/Collins-Walters W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.2% of games
8.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert